Monday, September 3, 2018

Weekly Investment #3


What is a plan and who are our learners?

The week's weekly investment explored the planning process for courses and how we connect material we aspire to teach to our learners.

We explored backward design in course planning, scaffolding, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Understanding by Design and other methods for instructional planning.



1) How do we plan for instruction?

Instruction is best planned for with the end result in mind. First, we must identify the desired results. With the result in mind to format an essential question.

Then, we must plan for assessment of learning. According to ASCD.org's Understanding by design there are six facets for understanding for assessments:

When someone truly understands, they:
  • Can explain concepts, principles, and processes by putting it their own words, teaching it to others, justifying their answers, and showing their reasoning. 
  • Can interpret by making sense of data, text, and experience through images, analogies, stories, and models. 
  • Can apply by effectively using and adapting what they know in new and complex contexts. 
  • Demonstrate perspective by seeing the big picture and recognizing different points of view. 
  • Display empathy by perceiving sensitively and walking in someone else’s shoes. 
  • Have self-knowledge by showing meta-cognitive awareness, using productive habits of mind, and reflecting on the meaning of the learning and experience.
The third and final part of the lesson planning process is planning the learning experiences and instruction. This seems odd to be the final step, but it makes sense. Many people see a really cool activity and want to incorporate it into the classroom in some fashion, and by doing this they create a lesson for that activity, not a meaningful activity for the lesson.

Keep in mind that while we lesson plan, we must first identify the destination before we attempt to select the route we will drive to get there.

2) What are the similarities between Significant Learning; Understanding by Design and the Universal Design for Learning?

The Universal Design for Learning is geared toward developing significant learning for unique learners to address the what, how, and why of the content they are learning. 

Understanding by Design is a three-step, backward design process which teachers utilize to develop significant learning. 

The two are different but not mutually exclusive. In fact, they overlap quite a bit and must both be used to design courses, units, and lessons for significant learning.

3) How you will incorporate the three pillars of Universal Design for Learning: multiple means of representation, multiple means of action and expression, and multiple means of engagement?

Multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement must be incorporated in your planning process. By incorporating these three pillars we break down barriers.

Incorporating multiple means of representation can happen in several ways. A specific example can include first, learning about a ruminant digestive system by discussing the function of each stomach, then looking at imagines of each stomach and inspecting their surface structures to correlate with their functions. In addition to pictures and discussion a teacher can incorporate a video, visit a farm with a cannulated cow, or ask a butcher for the digestive organs from ruminant animals. Through out the learning process students should be asked to recall vocabulary and functions for the various ruminant digestive parts. 

Multiple means of action and expression can be incorporated into lessons and plans in several ways, also. We aspire to allow students to choose from multiple options to express what they know and their levels of proficiency. This can look like allowing them to design a project to display their knowledge in a summative assessment, or simply asking a student open ended questions.

Multiple means of engagement is the most challenging pillar for me to comprehend how to incorporate. I understand that each student is unique and won't be intrinsically motivated to explore each topic or activity. Incorporating multiple means of engagement would mean allowing them more freedom to explore specific parts of a topic, once the basic knowledge and vocabulary have been captured. A specific example could look like a student learning the basic content of greenhouse management, but investigating the economic impacts of aphids in a greenhouse because economics and business models fire up that specific student. 


4) What is Scaffolding?

In education scaffolding means giving the students the support they need, in a positive interaction between the teacher and the student, to learn and utilize information you have given them. Scaffolding is how teachers get students to stretch, and reach the zone of proximal development.

We achieve scaffolding in a few steps. First, the teacher begins by teaching at a level the students can understand. Then, the teacher poses a problem out-loud of the students to process. Following the problem the teacher proposes a solution using action, images, and language.

This process is repeated and students are given positive reinforcement, regardless of their answer, to encourage participation. Through this repetition the students will grasp the new concepts, via scaffolding.


7 comments:

  1. Another blog well done Lisa! Scaffolding is important to remember not only in the agriculture classes but also what students have or have not learned in other classes prior to coming to you. Have a great week!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lisa, excellent job incorporating personal reflection with the content of this week's reading material! You did a good job supporting your response with visuals as well as examples that connect the material to the ag classroom. We will explore more about multiple means of engagement and what it looks like in action in the coming week!

    ReplyDelete
  3. For myself, I have found the best way to tackle including multiple means of engagement is to watch other teachers in their classrooms. My own learning style if actually fairly boring, I don't need a lot of connections made for me in order to grasp a concept, but this is certainly not true of all learners, really not true of most learners. Since I have to teach in ways that seem unnecessary for my own learning style, I really benefit from watching the creativity of others. I will intentionally seek out teachers who I know are skilled at multiple means or who have a very different learning style from myself so I can translate their approaches to my content. There is a lot of power in knowing what you don't know, and knowing what your professional weaknesses are so both can be tackled head on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel I can greatly relate to this. I have an uncanny ability to sit and discuss something and be able to get a handle on things. I can't wait to watch you and other teachers in action this spring!

      Delete
  4. "Begin with the end on mind"
    "Proper planning prevents poor performance"
    "Scaffolding"
    Some might say cliche's but the older I get, the more I know these concepts to be true... You are way ahead of the game if you can keep these concepts in the forefront as you learn and grow as a teacher, mentor and guide, helping your students reach their goals and providing them with tools with which to tackle challenges and respond to change... to grow and succeed. We always have more to learn and must strive to remember to listen, learn and keep an open mind... modeling the practices we espouse.
    I enjoyed your blog and look forward to future posts as you go through your journey!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lisa, great job making some excellent connections. All true. A word of advice/caution/whatever you want to make of it. Careful with the use of "understanding" as it relates to student performance. A wise administrator once challenged my professional thought as to what does it mean to understand something? Does it mean to kind of get it? Does it mean to know if fully? If 100% mastery is the theoretical goal, is "understanding" something really an adequate level of accomplishment? Just some Socratic food for thought. I am always here as a resource. Keep up the great work, can't wait to see what you develop in the coming year!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lisa, awesome blog! I appreciated all of the examples you used to explain the three pillars of universal design for learning! (and I love the meme)

    ReplyDelete